There are several key trends shaping headquarters operations in today’s business and economic environment. None of these is more important than having access to a talented workforce to help shape the future planning of the organization. Access to a skilled and adaptable workforce is the foundation of any successful headquarters operation. Companies are increasingly prioritizing talent acquisition and development as core components of their strategy.
In recent years, several large corporations have opted to split their headquarters across multiple locations or divide them into separate entities. These strategic decisions are influenced by various operational factors, including cost savings, access to a broader talent pool and operational resiliency.
High real estate costs in major cities are one of the drivers behind companies relocating or splitting their headquarters into more cost-effective regions. This shift allows businesses to maintain a presence in a large city while at the same time reducing expenses, enhancing operational efficiency and attracting a workforce that might not be willing to take on a city commute. Major urban centers like New York, San Francisco and Los Angeles have seen real estate prices soar the highest, leading many companies to rethink their headquarters strategies.
An Opportunity for Tier-Two and Tier-Three Markets
This corporate shift presents a major opportunity for secondary markets to attract divisional or regional headquarters projects. As companies seek cost-effective locations while maintaining access to talent and infrastructure, mid-sized cities and emerging business hubs can position themselves as ideal destinations.
Lower commercial real estate costs in secondary markets make them highly attractive for businesses looking to cut expenses while maintaining operational efficiency. As companies reevaluate their headquarters strategies, these markets are becoming prime locations for divisional, regional or even primary corporate headquarters.
Leasing rates in secondary cities can often be as much as 70 percent lower than in major metros like New York, San Francisco or Los Angeles. Lower property taxes and utility costs further reduce overhead.
The cost of living for employees is another major factor in why companies are relocating to secondary markets or expanding into regional hubs. When employees can afford a better quality of life at a lower cost, it benefits both talent retention and business operations.
“Talent retention and talent attraction will continue to be a primary factor for decision makers at the executive level,” said Rob O’Brian, President of O’Brian & Associates, a consulting firm that studies workforce trends in communities. “Communities that offer a very affordable and desirable lifestyle or, in other words, a great quality of life, are attractive to young families.”
This is not to say that new headquarters projects need to be in the suburbs: there are a number of large U.S. cities that still offer compelling locations for large headquarters operations.
The Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas area is attracting corporate headquarters thanks to the absence of a state income tax as well as lower real estate prices. Raleigh, North Carolina is known for its booming tech sector and a much lower cost of living than Silicon Valley. Phoenix, Arizona’s affordable housing is making it a hot spot for remote workers and corporate offices. Columbus, Ohio is rising as a Midwest tech and finance hub with a strong workforce and low costs.
Another of the key advantages of these secondary markets is their robust transportation networks, which not only support local and regional connectivity but also enable efficient access to international markets. With easier global connectivity, businesses in these regions can attract international talent, foster global partnerships and access broader capital markets.
Government Worker Layoffs Present New Labor Pool Opportunities
When it comes to splitting a larger office into smaller segments in more affordable markets, one recurring issue has traditionally been access to talent. While more affordable markets offer significant cost benefits, they sometimes face a talent gap when compared to major urban centers.
The perception that smaller markets may lack the required talent is not necessarily true. While major urban centers have traditionally been seen as talent hubs, smaller markets have been busy building new, strong talent ecosystems. Many second and third-tier markets are now seeing an influx of new talent entering the workforce. This fresh talent pool offers several advantages for companies considering these locations for regional or divisional headquarters.
The recent creation of the Department of Government Efficiency, better known as DOGE, by the Trump administration has launched efforts to downsize or “right-size” the federal workforce. The tasks assigned to DOGE have presented a significant opportunity for private sector employers. As government restructuring leads to workforce reductions, companies in various industries can capitalize on a highly skilled and already trained talent pool.
Employees transitioning out of federal government roles bring a wealth of experience, industry knowledge and transferable skills that can significantly benefit private employers in their headquarters operations. These professionals have operated in highly structured environments, managed complex projects and navigated regulatory landscapes — making them valuable assets in various vertical industries.
“Across the entire country and across a variety of sectors, employers have an opportunity to add quality talent to their team,” said O’Brian. “Large and small employers alike can reap the benefits of having this type of skilled workforce in the market and they are eager to have conversations about new possibilities.”
In the February Jobs Report compiled monthly by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment trended up in health care, financial activities, transportation and warehousing and social assistance while trending downward in federal government employment. At the time of the release of the report, unemployment stood at 4.1 percent at a national level.
In February alone, 10,000 federal employees became available to the market according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. “For those families that are affected, that’s bad news,” said O’Brian. “However, for employers, this creates a benefit for those in the market for talent.”
While the upheaval in the federal workforce can create short-term disruptions — such as adjustments in local labor markets and temporary gaps in services — communities that have planned ahead stand to reap significant long-term benefits. In the short term, communities might experience disruptions as federal workforce reductions lead to temporary economic and social challenges. However, those that have proactively planned can turn these challenges into long-term advantages.
A Case Study in Lake County, Florida
Fifty years ago, Lake County was primarily known for citrus groves that produced high-quality fruits. The citrus industry dominated the landscape. Disease in the orange groves, among other factors, forced civic leadership to reimagine what kind of community it could become. Loss of the groves forced about 70,000 workers to leave their communities in Lake County each day and head to other areas in the Orlando metro market for jobs. At this time, business and civic leadership devised ideas for new development that could take advantage of a skilled workforce that would prefer to remain in its home communities.
Approximately 20 years ago, the community, in partnership with Orlando Health South Lake Hospital, USA Triathlon and Pure Athletics, constructed the National Training Center in the City of Claremont in Lake County. This sports training center has become the training home to Olympic and world-class professional athletes in the sport of Track & Field, earning Claremont the title of “Man’s Fastest ZIP Code.”
This was just the first of the projects that Lake County attracted to fill the gap left by the orange groves. Lake County has been successful at positioning itself as an ideal destination to attract new company headquarters investments. Opportunities will continue to grow: the State of Florida is home to 90,000 federal employees, many of whom will likely become available to corporate and small business labor pools in light of federal labor force cuts.
The region was also aided by geography. Lake County and the Orlando metro area are in close proximity to the Space Coast region of Florida. This presents a unique opportunity for employers looking to attract highly skilled aerospace professionals transitioning from federal employment. With Cape Canaveral and the Kennedy Space Center less than 90 minutes away, private sector companies needing talent to staff a headquarters facility can tap into a talent pool rich in engineering, project management and technical expertise.
Businesses are increasingly selecting headquarters locations based on access to highly skilled talent, and the Lake County region is proximal to major universities, innovation hubs and employees with industry-specific expertise. This results in direct access to a continuous stream of educated professionals. For instance, Orlando has attracted firms such as Civix Government and KPMG due to its deep talent pool and proximity to educational institutions.
Establishing headquarters operations within innovation hubs fosters collaboration with startups, incubators and venture capitalists, enhancing a company’s innovative capabilities and allowing for complementary business development. These ecosystems, which include tech-enabled corporations and medical facilities, drive economic growth and productivity in the region.
Secondary Markets Attract Headquarters with Quality of Life
The decentralization of corporate headquarters from traditional primary markets to secondary and even tertiary markets is a trend driven by multiple factors — cost efficiency, access to skilled labor and evolving employee preferences for quality of life, which doesn’t include long and expensive commutes to large city centers.
Many secondary markets offer robust infrastructure, strong regional universities and economic incentives that make them attractive for headquarters relocation. Additionally, the rise of hybrid and remote work models has allowed companies to rethink their physical footprint, making flexible and cost-effective locations more viable.
The shifting landscape of headquarters operations and changes in the workforce presents new opportunities for businesses and communities alike. Secondary markets, with their lower costs, strong talent pools and other strategic advantages, are increasingly attracting corporate headquarters investments. As companies continue to seek new locations that align with their growth and workforce needs, emerging business hubs will play a crucial role in shaping the future of headquarters operations. T&ID
About the Author
